From a blog I accidentally found... It was in my reader so probably linked to by ( and From) Scoble. But it is certainly becoming more common, and moving up through so-called educated professionals, who use their on-line popularity to slander, defame, and attack. How long till the first round of seriously disruptive lawsuits??

December 14, 2006, 11:58 am
“Dear David, first off i would like to tell you that you are full of **** and did not research the zune enough to know your facts. “The following are incorrect, and not limited to: podcasts, giftcards, looks(which is an oppinion), controls, and content.
Also i would like to inform you that on the day of the launch(nov 14) there is a sceduled firmware upgrade which will most likely disband the 3 by 3 rule [which limits songs beamed between Zunes to three playbacks within three days], and the zune marketplace is also to offer video content about one month after launch. In my oppinion you should be fired for wrighting such a biast article in a (somewhat)professional newspaper.

Oh and in case you think i work for microsoft or have bad grammar, or
something, you should know that im 15!”

The deeper we sail into the new online world of communications, the sadder I get about its future. I’m OK with criticism, I’m fine with disagreement, I’m perfectly capable of handling angry mail. That’s not the issue here (although my teenage correspondent above was, in fact, wrong about every single one of his points).

I’ve even accepted personal attacks as part of the job. I’m a columnist; the heat comes with the kitchen.But what’s really stunning is how hostile *ordinary* people are to each other online these days.

Slashdot and Digg.com are extremely popular sites for tech fans. Each discussion begins with the presentation of an article or Web page–and then opens up the floor for discussion.

Lately, an increasing number of the discussions devolve into name-calling and bickering. Someone might submit, say, this item to Digg:

685 diggs. “AWESOME astronomy poem.” (posted by MetsFan 3 days ago)

Twinkle, twinkle, little star, how I wonder what you are.
Up above the world so high, like a diamond in the sky,
Twinkle, twinkle, little star, how I wonder what you are.

Before long, the people’s feedback begins, like this:

by baddude on 12/11/06
What’s yr problem, moron. You already said it’s a star, why would you then wonder what it is. Get a clue, or a life.

by neverland2 on 12/11/06

Dugg down as inaccurate. Stars do not twinkle. It’s the shifting atmosphere that causes an apparent twinkle. Or were you stoned all through science class?

by mrobe on 12/11/06

yo neverland2–It’s a poem, idiot. Nobody’s claiming that stars twinkle. Ever heard of poetic license?

Honestly, the intellectual level of you people is right up there with a gnat’s.

…and so on.

What’s worse is that the concentration of the nasty people increases as the civil ones get fed up and leave.What’s going on here?

My current theories:

* On the Internet, you’re anonymous. Since you don’t have to face
the person you’re dumping on, you don’t see any reason to display
courtesy.

* On the Internet, you’re anonymous. You worry that your comments
might get lost in the shuffle, so you lay it on thick to enhance your
noticeability.

* The open toxicity is all part of the political climate. We’ve
learned from the Red state-Blue state talking heads that open hostility
can pass for meaningful conversation.

* Young people who spend lots of time online are, in essence,
replacing in-person social interactions with these online exchanges.
With so much less experience conversing in the real world, they haven’t
picked up on the value of treating people civilly. That is, they
haven’t yet hit the stage of life when getting things like friends, a
spouse and a job depend on what kind of person you are.

* Many parents haven’t been teaching social skills (or haven’t been
around to teach them) for years, but Web 2.0 is suddenly making it
apparent for the first time. (”Web 2.0″ describes sites like Digg and
Slashdot, where the audience itself provides material for the Web
site.)

I’d give just about anything to hear what 15-year-old Josh’s parents
would say if they knew how little respect he holds for adults (let
alone the English language). Then again, maybe they wouldn’t be
surprised a bit.

The real shame, though, is that the kneejerk “everyone else is an
idiot” tenor is poisoning the potential the Internet once had. People
used to dream of a global village, where maybe we can work out our
differences, where direct communication might make us realize that we
have a lot in common after all, no matter where we live or what our
beliefs.

But instead of finding common ground, we’re finding new ways to spit
on the other guy, to push them away. The Internet is making it easier
to attack, not to embrace.

Maybe as the Internet becomes as predominant as air, somebody will
realize that online behavior isn’t just an afterthought. Maybe, along
with HTML and how to gauge a Web site’s credibility, schools and
colleges will one day realize that there’s something else to teach
about the Internet: Civility 101.